TheAfriForge

Governance

Open, traceable, and multi-stakeholder governance that ensures technical decisions serve Africa's long-term collective interest.

3

Permanent bodies

100%

Documented decisions

2/year

Governance reviews

Governance principles

Our governance model balances fast execution, institutional accountability, and public transparency.

Neutrality

No single actor can capture the foundation's strategic direction.

Accountability

Every decision is attributed, justified, and auditable.

Representation

Governance includes institutions, industry, academia, and technical communities.

Durability

Choices prioritize service continuity and long-term viability.

Our governing bodies

TheAfriForge relies on three complementary bodies to arbitrate, execute, and verify.

Strategic council

Defines vision, validates annual priorities, and safeguards the public interest.

  • Approve the annual roadmap
  • Arbitrate structural investments
  • Assess sovereignty alignment

Technical committee

Leads architecture, security, and interoperability standards across platforms.

  • Validate technical standards
  • Track service-level indicators
  • Coordinate security reviews

Audit and compliance unit

Controls traceability, process quality, and publication of evidence.

  • Publish quarterly indicators
  • Verify decision compliance
  • Trigger independent audits

Decision cycle

Every structural decision follows a shared cycle to ensure clarity, consultation, and execution discipline.

1

Qualification

The topic is formalized with goals, risks, options, and expected impact.

2

Consultation

Relevant stakeholders review the proposal and provide traceable feedback.

3

Arbitration

The competent body decides with written rationale and implementation conditions.

4

Publication

The decision is published with date, owners, tracking indicators, and review date.

5

Evaluation

An outcome review measures real impact and enables adjustment when needed.

Transparency commitments

Trust is built through evidence that is accessible, regular, and comparable over time.

Decision journal

Publication of a timestamped register for strategic and technical decisions.

Public indicators

Availability of performance, security, and reliability indicators.

Open reviews

Periodic review sessions with ecosystem members.

External audit

Regular independent assessment of governance and compliance practices.

Contribute to governance

Universities, institutions, companies, and technical communities can propose contributions to the charter and decision processes.

Join the governance framework